Please forward this error screen to sharedip-1071804868. All 6 different sources present similar ideas in their stories but different dates and places which caused them to oppose each other. As NHI considered the information found as precise.
Around the year of 1963, Pres. While I-Stories considers Valenzuela’s Pugad Lawin version as the most credible for a reason that his memories about the happening was still fresh when he wrote this. I do not agree with Valenzuela because he was not consistent with his stories despite the memoirs of him that was found. Where in later was found out that the place Pugad Lawin itself could not be proven to exist for no other records during the Spanish colonization speaks of it.
The Cry of Pugad Lawin cannot be accepted as historically accurate because it lacks positive documentation and supporting evidences from the witness. Katipunan leaders, it is possible that they conducted each cry at each of the different places around Caloocan. Caloocan, starting with The Cry of Pugad Lawin on August 23, 1896 down to The Cry of Balintawak on August 26, 1896. Haven’t found the Essay You Want?
Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Please forward this error screen to 206.